Hello group,
I think Wilson makes an interesting point in chapter 6, “Authenticity,” when she explains the differences between the reasons why men and women leaders sometimes change their agendas. When men shift agendas they conform to the expectations of other male leaders (98), so the “maleness” of the agenda and atmosphere are preserved. On the other hand, when women shift agendas they do it to “blend in with the boys,” therefore, sacrificing their female qualities. This point really puts this chapter into perspective because one has to be true to onesself in order to project authenticity. It makes me wonder how different the world would be if all the women leaders in the past and present would have never had to face this obstacle. By increasing awareness and gaining support, a more accepting platform will open up for women leaders to project their authenticity in the future – especially with the increasing recognition that women hold qualities and traits that are ideal for leadership.
Another interesting point in this chapter, that I never considered, is that when girls become adolescence they begin to comprehend the lack of leadership of women in the world. Because of this, young adult females use the “quest of perfection” as a way to gain acceptance from authority figures, who are mostly men. This can then translate into creating unhealthy relationships with men in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment